SSTB International Refereed Academic Journal of Sports
 
MAIN PAGE ARCHIVE DOWNLOAD PUBLICATION PRINCIPLES ABOUT DEPARTMENTS OF CONTACT
SSTB ULUSLARARASI HAKEMLİ AKADEMİK SPOR SAĞLIK ve TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ
  Search

2017 - 2018 TO BE HELD IN SUPPORT WE CONGRESS
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS
MAGAZINES
JEL CODES
LIBRARIES
INDEXES
OTHER MAGAZINES
EXAMPLE ARTICLES

  Member Login
User Name
Password

New Member | Forgot Pass. |Active
  News and Announcements
  Statistics
Today’s Visit : 237
Total Visit : 1019487
PUBLICATION PRINCIPLES

  1. Papers which are submitted to the journal for publication are expected not to have been published somewhere else, not to be in the evaluation process of another publication organ. If it is determined that the manuscript uploaded by the relevant author(s) has been sent for evaluation or REJECTED by another journal, we reserve all kinds of legal rights about the relevant author(s).
  2. Papers outside the accepted disciplines and fields in our journal are rejected. The accepted fields are stated under the “DISCIPLINES” title of our journal. None of the papers outside these fields can be published or requested to be published in this journal.
  3. The content and scientific responsibility of the papers cannot be imposed on the journal under any circumstances. The whole responsibility belongs to relevant author(s).
  4. In articles with more than one author, the correspondent author is the one who ranks first. Or the member uploading the paper to the journal accepts and has to accept the whole responsibility.
  5. The abstract should be prepared both in Turkish and English and between 150 and 250 words. The title should also be both in Turkish and English. The purpose of the paper, scope, method, limitations of research, findings and conclusion should be included in Turkish and English parts.
  6. If the paper has been prepared from such organs as thesis, book etc., it should be stated at the end of references part with “Author’s Note” by referring to the first title. If the paper has been prepared from a master’s or doctoral thesis, the name of the advisor should be ranked in the second place. If the thesis advisor doesn’t want to see her/his name in the relevant paper, our journal should be informed about this situation with a document. It should be a document with wet signature. Our journal and management doesn’t have such a liability to question author(s) about the source of papers reproduced from thesis or another paper. The whole responsibility belongs to author(s). The author(s) already accept these conditions.
  7. Sources used in the works must be prepared according to the appropriate template of the journal. This template is presented to all author(s) as a Word file on our website. Besides, the last volume of our journal should always be taken into account. Our journal and management unilaterally belongs the right to change these criteria in line with their own demands.
  8. Every paper evaluated should get the approval of two referees. If one of the referees has rejected and the other one has approved, the editor sends the paper to the third referee. In line with the opinions and suggestions of the third referee, editor acts in accordance with her/his own authority. Chief Editor of the journal unilaterally reserves the right to REJECT even if the paper has been approved by referees. In this case, none of the author(s) can claim a right or demand. All kinds of management, practice and procedure belong to the chief editor of the journal. The relevant paper prepared in English is evaluated by the English language editor. Also, every paper is evaluated in terms of the writing rules of our journal by the technical editor. If the English language editor decides that the paper is inappropriate for our journal, the authorized person who will REJECT or amend this decision is the chief editor. Language editor and technical editor don’t have the right to REJECT. They transmit their suggestions to the chief editor and the chief editor unilaterally applies the decision in line with the demands and suggestions. Field editors transmit their opinions regarding evaluation and publication of the papers uploaded to the system to the chief editor. The chief editor acts with her/his own authority in line with the opinions and suggestions of field editors. Major or minor corrections can be made after the evaluation of papers. Author(s) are requested for corrections THREE times. If the corrections aren’t made after three demands, the article is rejected after the chief editor is informed by the system editor. The manuscripts uploaded to the website are first analyzed by system editor or technical editor before sending to the referee. This analysis is performed within the framework of spelling rules. System or technical editor informs author(s) about the necessary demands. If these demands aren’t satisfied, the chief editor is informed about the result. Chief Editor makes the final decision according to the information. This decision is unilaterally up to the chief editor either in a negative or positive way. None of the institutions and individuals has the right to impose sanction on the decision made.
  9. English and Turkish abstracts should be written in Times New Roman with 12 pt. All author(s) are obliged to act and arrange their papers in accordance with the sample article format on our website.
  10. The names of the institutions of author(s) should be written in 12 pt. and italic with Times New Roman. It is stated in the sample article format.
  11. The paragraph spacing of the whole manuscript should be single spaced.
  12. The references should be stated in a way that the reference is italic and the name and author’s surname rank at the first place just like in the sample article. For example; Yılmaz, A., Güven, M., (2017). İşletmelerde Sağlık Yönetiminin Önemi, …………………………… Dergisi, Sayı: 1, Cilt: 1, ss.1-2. The references should be indicated within the text as (Yılmaz, 2017: 1-2) or (Yılmaz, ve diğ., 2017: 1-2). Internet resources are never used within the text. These sources are numbered and indicated at the bottom of the page. The citations made from such internet resources as Wikipedia should never be used. If such use of resources is determined, the manuscript is unilaterally REJECTED. None of the author(s) can impose a sanction and raise a demand on our journal in this matter.
  13. The internet resources should be indicated in the references part under the title of “INTERNET RESOURCES”. The link should be included in the resources and the Access date should be after the link like “E.T. 01.01.2017).
  14. Typesetting and editing of the paper should be in accordance with the sample article format on the website and the references within the text must be prepared as per the sample article.
  15. The current papers are uploaded to the system by the author being the member of the system step by step. The paper uploaded is sent to the relevant field editor by the system manager and asked for approval for referee evaluation. If there are more than one author name in the paper, this information should be inserted in the system together with the names and institutions of author(s) while uploading the paper to the system. Our journal and management never accepts responsibility regarding the problems that may arise about the names and institutions of authors related to the article. This information must be unilaterally inserted in the system by author(s). Our journal and management aren’t responsible to insert this information to the system. Our journal and management only take into account the information uploaded to the system by author(s).
  16. The language of our journal is English. However, the papers prepared in different situations and principles are accepted in other languages. In this case, the publication board unilaterally reserves the right to use initiative or reject. Relevant author(s) cannot be effective or impose sanction on our journal in this matter.
  17. The author cannot decide on which referee will evaluate the paper and won’t know the information of the referee making the evaluation. After the referee evaluation of the relevant paper, the correspondent author who accepts the responsibility in uploading the paper to the system is informed via the web system. The e-mail address in the journal system should be valid and correct. The member author is unilaterally responsible for any delay and problem that may arise about the authors whose membership information isn’t valid and correct in the system. Our journal doesn’t address comments to other authors. The member author who uploads the paper to the system is the addressee and the responsibility belongs to the relevant author. If the paper is uploaded to the system by someone else whose name isn’t in the paper, the relevant member becomes responsible for this situation. Our journal and management are never responsible for possible problems. All kinds of correspondences and information related to the article are directed to the member author. Our journal isn’t supposed to inform other author(s).
  18. Information about the authors and the materials of communication are confidential and it is only known by system manager and the editor. Therefore, authors don’t have such a right to ask for referee evaluation or any other demand. Information on referees and authors are only shared with the system editor, technical editor, chief editor and the field editor.
  19. The number of pages uploaded to the system is 20. This number can increase according to the subject of the paper. Annexes and tables can be excluded from this number. However, publication board, field editor and the chief editor unilaterally reserve their right to make a positive or negative evaluation. Author(s) cannot claim a right in this matter.
  20. Our journal is an "e" electronic journal but is also published in paper version. Individuals who would like to get printed version of the journal can obtain it by paying the necessary fee to the relevant printing company. Our journal does not have to provide printed version of the journal to any author or individual. Annual membership fee should also be sent to relevant printing company for works sent to our journal. A reasonable amount of fee is requested from the author of the paper approved for publication considering the journal expenses and according to the conditions of that time. The relevant author or the person who makes the payment is sent a receipt about the payment by the beneficiary company.
  21. Evaluation process of works uploaded to the system is two months. Works which are not evaluated within this period of time and about which information report is not received are sent to a different referee. Author(s) cannot claim a right on our journal and management because of this delay. It is out of question for the papers being in the referee evaluation process to be withdrawn from the journal under any circumstances.
  22. Our journal publishes four times a year. The journal and publication board has a right to publish special issues. This is up to the initiative of journal management.
  23. Publication and copyright of published papers belong to our journal. Publication right of every paper uploaded to the system is automatically transferred to the journal. The responsible author approves the transfer contract created at the same time with the button on the website while uploading the paper to the system. None of the authors are requested to sign the copyright agreement for this procedure. Journal management has the right to demand transfer agreement with wet signature if required. The papers being in the referee evaluation process cannot be withdrawn from the publication. A valid reason should be indicated for the papers that are withdrawn. Otherwise, legal action is unilaterally taken against the relevant author(s). Author(s) approve these conditions in advance for the paper uploaded to the system. None of the author(s) have a right to object.
  24. Relevant author(s) are supposed to insert the ethics board or institutional approval while uploading the paper to the system if necessary. The whole responsibility unilaterally belongs to author(s) in case of a possible problem if the information of papers for which ethics board or institutional approval is required isn’t inserted in the system or the journal management isn’t informed. Our journal is never asked to accept such a responsibility. Our journal and management doesn’t have to ask or monitor this information.

IT IS CONSIDERED THAT ABOVEMENTIONED 24 ITEMS OF PUBLICATION PRINCIP­LES GUIDELINE ARE ACCEPTED BY AUTHOR OR AUTHORS WHO ARE INVOLVED IN THE SYSTEM. NO AUTHOR HAS THE RIGHT TO OBJECT TO THESE PRINCIPLES. OUR JOURNAL HAS UNILATERAL RIGHT IN TERMS OF PUBLICATION PRINCIP­LES, AND PUBLISHING, EVALUATION OR REFUSAL OF WORKS. THIS RIGHT CANNOT BE CHANGED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS. OUR JOURNAL HAS THE RIGHT TO USE ITS LEGAL RIGHTS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF RELE­VANT LAWS AND LIABILITIES IN CASE OF AUTHOR/AUTHORS WHO DO NOT ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT PRINCIPLES AND RULES. EVERYBODY WHO IS INVOLVED IN THE SYSTEM HAS AUTOMATICALLY AGREED ON THESE POINTS IN ADVANCE.

Geri

                             Copyright ©2011 SSTB International Refereed Academic Journal of Sports, Health and Medical Sciences All Rights Reserved. xdizayn.net